Biometrics

[Fairlight]

Yo, homey, in case you don' be listenin', Bill Vermillion done said:
> 
> > So how hard would it be to come up with something that will detect core
> > heat signatures, note their vector, and sound an alarm if two go in on
> > one authorisation, but not if two go out (obviously one or more of the
> > secondary departures would be kids.
> 
> Such a high-tech solution for a low-tech problem.

Well hell, making sure the right person is picking them up is a low-tech
problem, but you're already bringing in high-tech equipment far beyond
reason.  What's one more step?

> comb type.    And the solution for going out is to have one
> entrance and another for exit.

Like nobody's ever held an exit door open for an entering person.
*chuckle*  You see it all the time at stores.

> > Of course, this is still subject to threat of duress...someone threatens a
> > husband or wife's life unless someone brings out another child that isn't
> > theres.   But it does improve the system.

Dear Lord, did I -really- type "theres"?!!!!  *faint*  *recover*  I'm
sorry, "...theirs."  

I'm really -not- feeling well, am I?  Eesh.

> That becomes a matter for the law to handle.  That fall under
> violent crime and not security.

So does abducting kids in general, but you didn't have a problem with it
when they brought up hand scanning.  *confused*  Either it's an issue or it's
not.  Personally, I don't think it is worth the expense and complexity.
But you can't realistically say one falls under crime and not security and
then say the other is the obverse.  They either both are or both aren't.

mark->
-- 
Bring the web-enabling power of OneGate to -your- filePro applications today!

Try the live filePro-based, OneGate-enabled demo at the following URL:
               http://www2.onnik.com/~fairlite/flfssindex.html