fpsupport (was Re: segmentation violation in fp)

[Jean-Pierre A. Radley]

Ken Brody propounded (on Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:36:15PM -0400):
| Fairlight wrote:
| [...]
| > > Well, at the risk of sounding self important, why in hell didn'tyou
| > > change it to support@, like every other tech company on the planet
| > > uses?  :-)
| > 
| > Someone at fP-Tech responded to this a few months back with something
| > -very- close to (if not identical to), "We -like- fp*."
| > 
| > I still say an alias wouldn't be a bad idea.  What could it hurt?
| 
| Just out of curiosity, has anyone here actually tried it without the "fp"?
| (Hint, hint.)

What are you saying, Ken -- that there's a new Olympic sport called
bushel-hiding, and that fptechnologies is a favored contestant???

-- 
JP