fpsupport (was Re: segmentation violation in fp)

[Jay R. Ashworth]

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:36:15PM -0400, Kenneth Brody wrote:
> Fairlight wrote:
> [...]
> > > Well, at the risk of sounding self important, why in hell didn'tyou
> > > change it to support@, like every other tech company on the planet
> > > uses?  :-)
> > 
> > Someone at fP-Tech responded to this a few months back with something
> > -very- close to (if not identical to), "We -like- fp*."
> > 
> > I still say an alias wouldn't be a bad idea.  What could it hurt?
> 
> Just out of curiosity, has anyone here actually tried it without the "fp"?
> (Hint, hint.)

No, Ken; cause we do like we're told.  :-)
-- j
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra at baylink.com
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

	"You know: I'm a fan of photosynthesis as much as the next guy,
	but if God merely wanted us to smell the flowers, he wouldn't 
	have invented a 3GHz microprocessor and a 3D graphics board."
					-- Luke Girardi