Licensing
Dennis Malen
dmalen at malen.com
Mon Jun 23 09:59:35 PDT 2014
Nancy,
That is exactly why we and others have not upgraded. Each user usually has a
minimum of 3 windows open at any one time.
I love filePro and would love to upgrade and continue with this most
efficient and robust data management system.
If filePro considered a change, they would sell many more software packages.
Perhaps we should have a user meeting again and approach filePro to consider
a change. Your Quick Books analogy is spot on.
Dennis Malen
-----Original Message-----
From: filepro-list-bounces+dmalen=malen.com at lists.celestial.com
[mailto:filepro-list-bounces+dmalen=malen.com at lists.celestial.com] On Behalf
Of Nancy Palmquist
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 12:31 PM
To: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
Subject: Re: Licensing
I fully agree with Mark and Mike.
The Unix world is comfortable with the window/seat relationship because it
is not the environment where people open piles of windows to jump from one
app to another, it never was. The systems were always one session and one
licenses.
But filePro went from no control or limit at all on Windows systems, to the
same kind of model with window/seat and the market for windows users is
totally different. I have many windows applications and none work on that
model it is always per seat. I can open multiple documents or spreadsheets
to work on at the same time. The Windows server only tracks the user as
using one session and not using different sessions for each open filepro
window. The expectation on Windows is totally different by the end user.
I have always thought that the license model for Windows was not suited to
the Windows market at all.
The filePro application is a tool for handling data, it does not provide the
data or the development that makes the data work. For example, I can buy
Quickbooks that offers the runtime tool and the fully developed application
already developed and ready to roll for $199 (roughly). To buy a single
user filepro runtime license will will pay $295. That is without any
application development at all.
If I have a business with 50 employees that all need access to filepro, I am
paying $6,250 for each user to get one open window into filepro.
(They do offer those seats at $125 per user.) Now say the customer gladly
paid that thinking they were buying seats and now it is time to upgrade them
to 5.7 and we take a survey and find that on average our 50 employees open
80 windows plus we run automated processes that open 2 more and I have 82
windows at a cost of $10,250 or $4,000 more for using the system exactly as
we did in 5.0 but now the licensing is watching windows and not seats. How
do you explain the additional $4,000 cost to a customer?
Now I have seen the annual pricing subscription that will give the customer
all future upgrade for at no charge, but did not think the advancements in
filepro are providing value for that additional cost, all I get is the
ability to budget my costs and pay for future upgrades before any are
released.
I also still see the entire license scheme as unworkable for a distributed
piece of software. Requiring a file to be collected and saved to activate
the license, instead of supplying an activation code that can typed in to a
screen is a huge issue for my customers in the windows world.
Well - I have to stop now. I will rant on this all day. Sorry but this had
been a huge issue for my customers on Windows systems and I can not see any
good solution - except retire and be done with it.
Nancy
On 6/21/2014 4:02 PM, Fairlight wrote:
> That's the way it works. Each window eats a seat.
>
> And you're far from the only person thinking it. I can think of three
> major clients who would upgrade almost immediately if it weren't for
> the license manager bullshit - even figuring in the exhorbitant upgrade
costs.
> The main thing keeping people on 5.0.14 is the licence manager, full stop.
>
> mark->
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 09:54:47AM -0400, Mike Fedkiw thus spoke:
>> So if I'm understanding this correctly, it's pretty much the windows that
eat up licenses. If I have three separate Windows of filepro open on my
computer I'm pretty much using three licenses running Windows server 03 or
08. If that's the way it works now, at least that would be an easier way for
me to determine exactly or approximately how many licenses I'd need to
purchase.
>>
>> If I'm wrong in what I'm thinking, I freaking give up, yet again. I
wonder who else thinks that filepro could be loosing a hell of a lot more
money than they're making by implementing this ridiculous licensing crap.
It's kept me from updating for years now and still might. I'm sure I'm not
the only one that feels that way.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2014, Fairlight <fairlite at fairlite.com> wrote:
>>> In the system case, in 5.7, no extra licenses are used. Pre-5.7,
>>> each uses a license seat.
>>>
>>> If you want to post to the list, you could hit reply and change the
>>> recipient to filepro-list at lists.celestial.com in your mail client.
>>>
>>> mark->
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:36:29PM -0400, Mike Fedkiw thus spoke:
>>>> Okay, I'm still confused here, what happens when I'm in dclerk
>>>> and
>>> do a
>>>> system command to open another dclerk and then another and
>>> another.Â
>>>> I've written some processing where I could possibly be six
>>>> levels
>>> deep
>>>> into those dclerks, does each of those commands eat up another
>>> license?
>>>> If that's the case, I could possibly need to buy up to or even
>>> more
>>>> than fifty licenses for six computers, that just seems ridiculous.
>>> It
>>>> can't really be like that, can it
>>>> The other thing is that I'm confused as how to reply to this so it
>>>> would get posted to the list. I'm thinking that only you are
>>>> going
>>> to
>>>> see this reply.
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 20, 2014, Fairlight wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You must buy enough seats to cover every active "user". On a SCO
>>> text
>>>> console (but not Linux text consoles), all the main consoles count
>>>> as
>>> one
>>>> seat. I -believe- FacetWin had some sort of arrangement that made
>>> Facet
>>>> akin to the SCO console that way...but on SCO, not Linux, if memory
>>> serves.
>>>> Other than that, every time you invoke clerk, cabe, report,
>>>> ddefine,
>>> etc.,
>>>> you're eating a license. I don't think runmenu eats any, but could
>>> be
>>>> wrong.
>>>> About the only upside to 5.7.x is that a SYSTEM to a clerk or
>>>> report
>>> no
>>>> longer takes another user seat from the license pool. Something
>>> which
>>>> should have been done back in 4.5, IMNSHO. Not for lack of
>>>> begging, bitching, moaning, and general complaining from the
>>>> community for
>>> years.
>>>> Now they've "fixed" it, and
>>>> "nobody" (few) want to buy the new product with its attendant
>>>> license manager.
>>>> But except in very specific and rare instances, yes, every open
>>> instance is
>>>> a "user".
>>>> mark->
>>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:38:05PM -0400, Mike Fedkiw thus spoke:
>>>>
>>>> I know this has probably been gone over multiple times by now, I
>>>> think I've actually seen it being talked about but it just
>>> seemed
>>>> confusing to me.
>>>> I'm still so confused as to what id actually have to buy to
>>>> be
>>> able
>>>> to use the most current version of filepro.
>>>> I am pretty much the only one that uses the development but
>>>> I'll
>>> at
>>>> times have 3-4 Windows of it open while working on something.
>>>> My
>>> emp
>>>> loyees also usually have multiple Windows open on each terminal.
>>> Now
>>>> if I have to buy a license for every open window, even if
>>>> it's
>>> on
>>>> the same machine, that's just ridiculous.
>>>> Let's see, at any given time there could possibly be 15+
>>> filepro's
>>>> running although I've only got 6 computers not counting the
>>> server
>>>> which is still on server 2003.
>>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated, Mike
>>>> -- Sent with K-@ Mail - the evolution of emailing.
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL:
>>>>
>>> [1]http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/2
>>>> 0140620/2bc6a976/attachment.html
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________
>>>> Filepro-list mailing list
>>>> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
>>>> [2]http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>>>>
>>>> -- Sent with [3]K-@ Mail - the evolution of emailing.
>>>>
>>>> References
>>>>
>>>> 1.
>>> http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/2014
>>> 0620/2bc6a976/attachment.html
>>>> 2. http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>>>> 3.
>>> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.onegravity.k10.pro
>>> 2
>> -- Sent with K-@ Mail - the evolution of emailing.
>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
>> scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/20140
>> 621/c82030e7/attachment.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> Filepro-list mailing list
>> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
>> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
--
Nancy Palmquist
Owner
Virtual Software Systems - www.vss3.com
(412) 835-9417
_______________________________________________
Filepro-list mailing list
Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list