Browse lookup problem

[Richard Kreiss]

Richard
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Kenneth Brody <kenbrody at spamcop.net> wrote:

> On 6/3/2011 3:24 PM, Richard Kreiss wrote:
>>> From: filepro-list-bounces+rkreiss=verizon.net at lists.celestial.com
>>> [mailto:filepro-list-bounces+rkreiss=verizon.net at lists.celestial.com] On
>>> Behalf Of Kenneth Brody
> [...]
>>> On 6/3/2011 12:53 PM, Richard Kreiss wrote:
> [...]
>>>> Once I saw that they held the correct values, I recreated the browse and
>>> then split it apart using h,I,j and then commented out the original code and
>>> test it.  The new code worked.
>>> 
>>> What do you mean by "split it apart"?
>> 
>> Use the wizard to define the browse and then separate what the wizard
>> created into it parts Ba, BB&  BC.
> 
> But it was already "split apart" in the original code you showed, which used ba/bb/bc.  You said you took that code, and "then split it apart using h,I,j".
> 


Ken, I redid the browse programming again. I commented out the original. The recreated the above programming using hij   



> Which is it?
> 
>>>> I then replaced the ba, bb, and bc with  h, I, and J and adjusted the browse
>>> command.  This worked fine.
>>> 
>>> So, you say that this fails:
>>> 
>>>      ba="(brw=10 xkey=xdeu show=pkeep prc=nocard fill=desc,top)"
>>>      bb="[\b5 Master Code    Tp Last Four    Expires \a-]"
>>>      bc="*3<16    *5  XXXX*18      *6"
>>>      lookup card = l_card  k=4    i=B -nxm b=(ba&bb&bc)
>>> 
>>> But this works:
>>> 
>>>      h="(brw=10 xkey=xdeu show=pkeep prc=nocard fill=desc,top)"
>>>      i="[\b5 Master Code    Tp Last Four    Expires \a-]"
>>>      j="*3<16    *5  XXXX*18      *6"
>>>      lookup card = l_card  k=4    i=B -nxm b=(h&i&j)
>>> 
>>> With nothing else in the processing being changed?
> 
> You didn't answer this question.

As I still can't get into their system, I can't confirm with certainty if any changes were made  
> 
>>> In that case, something is different between the definitions of ba/bb/bc and
>>> h/i/j.
>>> 
>>> However, you say that you "split it apart" when you changed it to h/i/j.
>>> Can you show the actual code that "works"?
>> 
>> See above h= i= j= - those are the values
> 
> There is no code above which uses h/i/j, only ba/bb/bc.  (Well, except for my code, that is.  You haven't shown any of your code that uses h/i/j.)
> 
>> See line 62, 683&  684 - these is where the problem was.
> 
> Those are just the assignments to ba/bb/bc.  Are you having a problem with the assignments to those fields?
> 
>> Full old code from my system:
> [... snip code using ba/bb/bc ...]
> 
> That's the code you already showed, with ba/bb/bc, which "doesn't work". You still haven't shown the code with h/i/j that does "work".
> 
>> As I indicated, I cannot get into their system as their communication
>> server is still down.  Once I can get in, I will test the msgbox as you
>> suggested.
> 
> And show the code with h/i/j that "works".
> 
> -- 
> Kenneth Brody