Browse lookup problem

[Kenneth Brody]

On 6/3/2011 3:24 PM, Richard Kreiss wrote:
>> From: filepro-list-bounces+rkreiss=verizon.net at lists.celestial.com
>> [mailto:filepro-list-bounces+rkreiss=verizon.net at lists.celestial.com] On
>> Behalf Of Kenneth Brody
[...]
>> On 6/3/2011 12:53 PM, Richard Kreiss wrote:
[...]
>>> Once I saw that they held the correct values, I recreated the browse and
>> then split it apart using h,I,j and then commented out the original code and
>> test it.  The new code worked.
>>
>> What do you mean by "split it apart"?
>
> Use the wizard to define the browse and then separate what the wizard
> created into it parts Ba, BB&  BC.

But it was already "split apart" in the original code you showed, which used 
ba/bb/bc.  You said you took that code, and "then split it apart using h,I,j".

Which is it?

>>> I then replaced the ba, bb, and bc with  h, I, and J and adjusted the browse
>> command.  This worked fine.
>>
>> So, you say that this fails:
>>
>>       ba="(brw=10 xkey=xdeu show=pkeep prc=nocard fill=desc,top)"
>>       bb="[\b5 Master Code    Tp Last Four    Expires \a-]"
>>       bc="*3<16    *5  XXXX*18      *6"
>>       lookup card = l_card  k=4    i=B -nxm b=(ba&bb&bc)
>>
>> But this works:
>>
>>       h="(brw=10 xkey=xdeu show=pkeep prc=nocard fill=desc,top)"
>>       i="[\b5 Master Code    Tp Last Four    Expires \a-]"
>>       j="*3<16    *5  XXXX*18      *6"
>>       lookup card = l_card  k=4    i=B -nxm b=(h&i&j)
>>
>> With nothing else in the processing being changed?

You didn't answer this question.

>> In that case, something is different between the definitions of ba/bb/bc and
>> h/i/j.
>>
>> However, you say that you "split it apart" when you changed it to h/i/j.
>> Can you show the actual code that "works"?
>
> See above h= i= j= - those are the values

There is no code above which uses h/i/j, only ba/bb/bc.  (Well, except for 
my code, that is.  You haven't shown any of your code that uses h/i/j.)

> See line 62, 683&  684 - these is where the problem was.

Those are just the assignments to ba/bb/bc.  Are you having a problem with 
the assignments to those fields?

> Full old code from my system:
[... snip code using ba/bb/bc ...]

That's the code you already showed, with ba/bb/bc, which "doesn't work". 
You still haven't shown the code with h/i/j that does "work".

> As I indicated, I cannot get into their system as their communication
> server is still down.  Once I can get in, I will test the msgbox as you
> suggested.

And show the code with h/i/j that "works".

-- 
Kenneth Brody