Crap mail lacking a Subject Header

[John Esak]

And that xxx monologues   word was banned?  Is banned?  Why the hell would
they ban an essentially clinical term for the damn thing.  And if hell and
damn don't do anything?  Why should vegematic...??  :-)

I've read the body of my text 20 times and there is no thing in it I can see
that would generate anything negative to a score.  Uless, do think possibly
the word efacic? It doesn't sound good does it... But doesn't sound porn
either. :-)

Well, if this didn't bounce a few more, nothing will... :-)

John

P.S. - Absolutely 20/40 with lenses is fantastic... I didn't mean every
outcome was 20/20 with them, but I think the percentage is very high.  It's
so funny that your eye is deep.  I have the same thing. They call my eye a
"long" eye. In fact, there was only one surgeon in the country 10 years ago
who had endoscopic tools "long" enough to re-attach my retina. It was the
reason every retina surgeon turned me down as "unfixable"... You're going to
be blind the rest of your life... Until one guy said... I know this one man
in New York City. His name is Yale Fisher.  And I wrote a long piece about
that whole experieince here. To this day, Yale and I are fast frineds...
Along with his wife and daughter. He now oscilates between Bascolm-Palmer in
Florida and NYC for his practice. I think he's working toward permanent
relocation of his practice to his home in Florida.  That will be a long way
to go for checkups, but I will. I had a 259 degree detachment and he said he
used more laser on me than any other three patients combined. I would not
let anyone else deal with the back of my eye. The 1% vision I have left is
critical to me staying alive, so a yearly trip to Florida is no big deal.
Now, if I can just keep my cornea on straight. This one has lasted longer
than any of the others being at 2 years 9 months right now. The longest to
date before this one has been 1.5 years, and this is #6. I'm Guinness book
of records on the next one I think.  Although, I would do anything at all to
stay out of that book for that reason.  Oldest rock and roll star yes, 7
corneas, no. :-)
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filepro-list-bounces+john=valar.com at lists.celestial.com 
> [mailto:filepro-list-bounces+john=valar.com at lists.celestial.co
m] On Behalf Of Bill Campbell
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 2:58 PM
> To: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subject: Re: Crap mail lacking a Subject Header
> 
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010, John Esak wrote:
> >Great going, Bill.
> >
> >Cataract surgery is one of the amazing things of our 
> civilization. To read
> >how much those "drugstore" glasses helped Ben Franklin... 
> And of course they
> >weren't even drugstore yet... :-)  He would have flipped if 
> he could have
> >replaced his lens..... By the way, did they implant a new 
> lens in either
> >eye? Or are you now what they call efacic? (sp?)
> 
> New lenses in both eyes.
> 
> >20/40 with no implant is fantastic. I'm guessing they did 
> not give you new
> >lenses since you would probably be at 20/20 or better in that case.
> 
> A basic problem with my eyes is that they are much deeper or 
> longer than
> normal, my left about 32mm while the norm is about 23.  My 
> left eye before
> correction was -19.5 diopter correction and my right about 
> -15 (where's Bob
> Stockler when we need him :-).  Getting accurate measurements at the
> extremes, and lenses to match is difficult.  Getting in the 
> ball park, and
> making the final adjustments with glasses is just fine by me. 
>  I've been
> wearing glasses since I was 5 years old, and not having them 
> on is strange.
> 
> BTW:  For some reason a couple of folk's list subscriptions 
> were suspended
> due to too many bounces of John's messages with the message that the
> message contains ``banned word''.  I can't for the life of me 
> figure out
> what was in his message that any sane filter would consider 
> banned.  The
> system banning both was vegena.net (which could be misspelled 
> to a banned
> word -- think the vegena monologue :-).
> 
> Bill
> -- 
> INTERNET:   bill at celestial.com  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
> URL: http://www.celestial.com/  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
> Voice:          (206) 236-1676  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820
> Fax:            (206) 232-9186  Skype: jwccsllc (206) 855-5792
> 
> The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of
> one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that
> oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the
> beginning if it is to be stopped at all. -- H. L. Mencken
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>