Time in @TM

[Jay R. Ashworth]

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:30:56PM -0400, John Esak wrote:
> > don't go far enough, requiring you to write lots and lots of code (the
> > continuing inability to have changeable fields in browse lookups, which
> > would have saved me about 2200 lines of original code, are the most
> > obvious example that come to mind).
> 
> ?
> 
> What do you mean "changeable fields in browse lookups". If it's what it
> sounds like it means, it has been possible since browse lookups began. But,
> I'm sure it means something other than what it says.... so  what does it
> mean ??

I mean "editable browse lookups"; ie: something that precludes the need
to write hundreds of lines of code to get reasonable header-detail
handling in *clerk.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra at baylink.com
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274