Time in @TM

[John Esak]

>
> don't go far enough, requiring you to write lots and lots of code (the
> continuing inability to have changeable fields in browse lookups, which
> would have saved me about 2200 lines of original code, are the most
> obvious example that come to mind).

?

What do you mean "changeable fields in browse lookups". If it's what it
sounds like it means, it has been possible since browse lookups began. But,
I'm sure it means something other than what it says.... so  what does it
mean ??