Bug in *report with -fp

[Bruce Easton]

> I regurgitated moments ago:
>
> Mark Of Fairlight wrote Thursday, March 08, 2007 1:47 PM:
> [..]
> >
> > I still say it should complain.  It'll complain if you use -f and
> > no output
> > format exists for the specified processing.  Not seeing a semantic
> > difference, here.
> >
> > mark->
>
> But Mark, I think what you last said confirms the consistency that filepro
> does seem to have when treating processing verses formats.
> Because the -fp
> is taking any format out of the picture, to me, this leaves the behavior
> entirely in the realm of processing and as others have indicated, it is
> consistent with how processing flags are treated.
>
> Bruce

Maybe it would seem more consistent if the flag was named "op"
form "only processing or some other flag that didn't have a leading
"f."  :)

Bruce

Bruce Easton
STN, Inc.