Looking for some upgrade advice
Boaz Bezborodko
boaz at mirrotek.com
Sun May 21 18:54:59 PDT 2006
Wally,
This is essentially the way I handle it with Netware. All executables
are run from the server, but are run on the client. All files are
stored on the server.
What advantages would I get with running Server 2003 over something like
Netware and/or why not run on Linux with Samba instead?
Thanks again for the advice.
Boaz
Wally Turnbull wrote:
> Boaz,
>
>
>
> The move is quite easy. Your workstations come with a Windows network
> client. The version of FilePro is the same. Whether you run filePro
> on the server on from the workstations is not big deal on a hardwired
> LAN. It will be very fast. I would keep all executables as well as
> the data bases on the server and let the workstations run everything
> from the server drive if I were you. That makes maintenance, upgrade
> and support easier.
>
>
>
> You biggest job will be to rebuild all of your users and groups and
> assign rights to devices and files. Even that is no big deal if you
> assign most of the permissions to groups and then put your users in
> the right groups. The permissions are slightly different than in
> Netware but close enough to make sense to you when you look at them.
>
>
>
> You can build your Windows server and add the permissions while the
> Netware server is still in use. Once that is done, copy the user
> files over to the new server and change the workstations' clients and
> login. It is a bit tedious but not difficult and only done once.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Wally
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com
> [mailto:filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com] *On Behalf Of *Boaz
> Bezborodko
> *Sent:* Friday, May 19, 2006 9:37 AM
> *To:* Transpower
> *Cc:* filepro-list at seaslug.org
> *Subject:* Re: Looking for some upgrade advice
>
>
>
> Is win2003 easy to move up to from Netware?
>
> I understand that running filePro on the server can speed things up
> given that the disk access is right there. But I don't have any
> complaints about access right now and we're working mostly on 7 year
> old PIIs and Celerons with a 100Mb ethernet. I'd rather spend the
> money on upgrading the individual computers and the server hardware to
> GigE and a faster disk subsystem.
>
> Any more thoughts or advice?
>
> Transpower wrote:
>
> My Windows 2003 Server and those of my clients have never crashed.
> Terminal Server works great; I can even connect to one wirelessly with
> my Windows Mobile 5 device (using Terminal Services client)! Of
> course I still also like SCO UNIX OpenServer--super reliable and fast,
> with good disaster recovery tools available.
>
> Regards,
> Ron Satz
> Transpower Corporation, www.transpowercorp.com
> <http://www.transpowercorp.com>, transpower at aol.com
> <mailto:transpower at aol.com>
> SCO Authorized and Microsoft Certified Systems Engineering
>
>
> Boaz Bezborodko wrote on 5/19/2006, 8:31 AM:
>
> What kind flexibility would I be gaining? Not being fascetious, it's
> just that I haven't really looked into any server feature sets since I
> installed Netware 5.
>
> My other concern is uptime and security, but it seems that 2003 is
> better than I was led to believe.
>
> Of course I coul just stick to newer and better hardware with the same
> old OS. Most of the hardware I'd consider (upgrading to a still old
> Storage Array 4300 RAID controller would still give me an 8-fold
> increase in disk transfer speeds and most of the database will fit in
> memory anyway) will have drivers for NW 5.
>
> Boaz
>
> John Esak wrote:
>
>I'm going to top-post... sorry.
>
>
>
>I am a *nix person almost exclusively... and I think getting a hold of a
>
>Unix guru like Bill Campbell to help you put in a Linux system would be
>
>unbeatable. HOWEVER... lacking the money (and I think it would be pretty
>
>considerable to do something like that...) I would never consider switching
>
>from a platform I know and like to something *completely* foreign. It would
>
>be just as hard to go from being a solid Unix house to a Windows server.
>
>The bottom line for me is to agree with Wally, if you are comfortable with
>
>Netware... moving to a @003 server would be relatively painless and offer
>
>you huge new flexibility.
>
>
>
>John Esak
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>
>>From: filepro-list-bounces+john=valar.com at lists.celestial.com <mailto:filepro-list-bounces+john=valar.com at lists.celestial.com>
>>
>>[mailto:filepro-list-bounces+john=valar.com at lists.celestial.com]On
>>
>>Behalf Of Boaz Bezborodko
>>
>>Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:30 PM
>>
>>To: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com <mailto:filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
>>
>>Subject: Looking for some upgrade advice
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>I want to start planning an upgrade of our company's server. Currently
>>
>>we are using FilePro on Windows working off an old Netware 5.0 server
>>
>>based on a PII-350 machine.
>>
>>
>>
>>The FilePro applications themselves run decently and will obviously run
>>
>>better if I simply upgraded the server hardware and the network to GigE.
>>
>>
>>
>>I was considering using Linux instead of Netware, but does this mean
>>
>>having to learn something completely new or are there some decent
>>
>>packaged versions that avoid some of the pain?
>>
>>
>>
>>Any other options I should be considering?
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>
>>
>>Boaz
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>Filepro-list mailing list
>>
>>Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com <mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
>>
>>http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> <mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/20060521/255f2d31/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list