Antiquated Software

[Lerebours, Jose]

John posted:

> 
> > What -I- took away from his question was a valid question 
> to put to the
> > people complaining:  "Why do you feel, exactly, that this is
> > 'antiquated'?"
> >
> > The point is to narrow it down the way Ken does with bug reports and
> > problems here.  WHAT, precisely, do you mean by "doesn't 
> work"?  You know,
> 
> No, I said exactly what I meant. Walter's question was what 
> is widely known
> throughout the legal world (and the world in general) as a "leading"
> question. If the idea is to find out what they don't like 
> about filePro.
> Simply ask.. "What don't you like about it?" Nothing more.
> 
> This was no big deal. I don't have time for any more 
> discussion about it...
> unless Walter feels I totally mis-read his commnent, I'll 
> reply, but to turn
> this (that part of my comment) into a thread... nuh, uh. Got 
> better things
> to do. Sorry.
> 

Funny how John worries about how some one starts flames and yet
he makes sure it does get started and feeds it and feeds it and
insists that it lives and so he feeds it and feeds it ...

Was that a run on?

If you do not want flames, do no promote nor encourage them.  If 
you feel that comments are leading towards that direction, do 
not allow to be lead thus denying the opportunity to start the
very flames you start by making such claims.

Yes, I am still alive and lurking ... Working with filePro and
trying to get it deployed throughout Central and South America.
Ironically, fighting with Oracle and a team of over 100 programmers.



JL