Odd Index Behavior
Kenneth Brody
kenbrody at bestweb.net
Tue Feb 7 14:52:11 PST 2006
Quoting Frank7767 (Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:36:28 EST):
> System SCO Unix 5.6
> Filepro 5.0.14
>
> Some fool tripped a circuit breaker and the system crashed..Indices were
> smashed on a major file.
>
> One field indexed was the date field (8,mdy/)
> Deleted and rebuilt the index....When I ran a program which used
> (10,mdyy/)
> date field to lookup using the newly built index...It failed...
> I changed the lookup field to (8,mdy/) and it worked.
>
> The puzzle is why did this work before and not now???
Define "failed".
Was the former incarnation of the index pre-4.5 style, and the new
one 4.5+ style? (Or vice versa?)
--
KenBrody at BestWeb dot net spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
http://www.hvcomputer.com
http://www.fileProPlus.com
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list