(CAS) filePro Speed on Windows 200x Server

[Chris Sellitto]

[...]
> For years we ran on a
> Novell 5.x NOS, using filePro 4.X. All workstations were a mix of
> Windows 98/98se/XP. All ran relatively quick. We then upgraded to
> filePro 5.X, and noticed a slight degrade in the speed, but nothing we
> could not deal with. When we moved locations, we decided to change over
> from Novell to Windows 200x servers. It was then we noticed a
> significant downgrade in the speed of filePro.
[...]

>Are the workstations still 98, or were the workstations all upgraded
>to Win2K?

we do still have some Win98 workstations, but the processes that I speak of,
are all run on WinXP, or 2000/2003 machines.

>There was a slight change made in filePro's display routines around
>5.0.09 or .10, which had no impact on performance on 95/98/Me systems,
>but apparently causes a performance hit on NT/2K/XP/2003 systems.  (No
>one reported this until recently -- see "Show Commands are Slowing
>Speed of Filepro" on this list sometime in the past month.)

we have version 5.0.13DN9.

>Do you do a large number of SHOW statements in the examples you site?
>See also my "tip of the day - video sync" post around the same time.

there are no show commands in the processes I am concerned about, but where can
I find the old "Show Commands are Slowing Speed of filePro" posts.  Do those posts have
solutions to the performance hit on those operating systems?
I have also employed the tip of the day - video sync, which works well by the way.