printer file "name" - problem RESOLVED!!!!!
Brian K. White
brian at aljex.com
Mon Mar 21 19:34:03 PST 2005
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Esak" <john at valar.com>
To: "Fplist (E-mail)" <filepro-list at seaslug.org>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:08 PM
Subject: RE: printer file "name" - problem RESOLVED!!!!!
>
> Dennis,
>
> I have completely avoided this thread... it just seemed to be going on
> pretty well between you and Ken... or others... I ignored. Today I caught
> one question from either you or Brian (it was apparently from Brian, but
> looked to be from you.. the whole message was unquoted...) Anyway, no
> matter. It mentioned Ken saying that using PUTENV and filePro variables
> would not affect the current running process...
>
> Okay, first off... PUTENV works entirely... correctly, and completely. At
> least it has for me for many years... I rely on it heavily, daily in
> almost
> everything I write. I think you should have no qualms about using it and
> GETENV. What Ken was probably talking about (and I can only guess because
> I
> didn't see his words...) was that you can not use PUTENV with the filePro
> PATH variables, i.e., PFDIR, PFDATA and PFPROG... to change the
> environment
> of the "current" process. Doesn't that sound reasonable. As for all other
> variables (maybe excepting PFDSK??) I don't see any problem.
>
> Of course, this is just a guess about what you are asking about.
>
> John
You don't know what you're talking about.
Read the saved emails and/or refrain from deleting mails from threads you
ever intend to join.
I was very clear a couple of times already so I don't see the point in
repeating myself because you were ignoring the thread.
Brian K. White -- brian at aljex.com -- http://www.aljex.com/bkw/
+++++[>+++[>+++++>+++++++<<-]<-]>>+.>.+++++.+++++++.-.[>+<---]>++.
filePro BBx Linux SCO Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD #callahans Satriani
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list