Deleted key not fournd

John Esak john at valar.com
Mon Dec 19 10:06:59 PST 2005


Jumping in here sight unseen. Usually, these difficult DKNF things result
from some strange (but possibly clever) code that either DELETES a record
combined with "lookup -", or in archival situation where you are deleting a
lot of records from one file and writing them into another. These are two
areas which caused most of the DKNF errors I can remember. I'm sure this
doesn't help you at all. Also, I haven't seen one in 5.0.14 yet.... so I'm
thinking you may have some strange code... meaning it should work, but a
quirk somewhere or somehow is causing the failure. The one thing to be
absolutely sure of is that you don't have an index mix-defined... one
charater too long or short over a field which has been re-defined to be that
character longer or shorter. This will ABSOLUTELY and IMMEDIATELY cause DKNF
errors.

John Esak


> -----Original Message-----
> From: filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com
> [mailto:filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com]On Behalf Of Linda Gray
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 12:45 PM
> To: 'Kenneth Brody'; filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subject: RE: Deleted key not fournd
>
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> We have set the PFBIXERRORS=OFF, and added -p flag when deleting records,
> but still are having DKNF error messages that lock up the fp process.
>
> I believe we are using 5.0.14d4 on one server, 5.00.13D4 on another, and
> having the same problem on both.
>
> Any more ideas?  This is turning into a big problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Linda Gray
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com
> [mailto:filepro-list-bounces at lists.celestial.com] On Behalf Of
> Kenneth Brody
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:55 PM
> To: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subject: RE: Deleted key not fournd
>
> Quoting Linda Gray (Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:36:18 -0600):
>
> [... DKNF errors ...]
> > Do you need a write after a delete?
> [...]
>
> No.
>
> Do you have any lookups that you modify (including deleting) that
> do not have a "-p" flag?
>
> --
> KenBrody at BestWeb dot net        spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
> http://www.hvcomputer.com
> http://www.fileProPlus.com
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list



More information about the Filepro-list mailing list