variable lookups possible?

[Jeff Harrison]

--- John Esak <john at valar.com> wrote:
> >
> > > John
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, I guess I was not clear.  My generic lookup
> > processing does not build another processing
> table.
> > What I should have said was that there are two
> ways to
> > do this that I can think of.  #1 The cumbersome
> way
> > that you describe is what I am doing in the call
> > table.  #2 is to build processing that builds
> > processing.
> >
> > Of course, as you are aware, the beauty of making
> this
> > a call table is that I only need to write the
> > cumbersome code once, and I can use it in a
> limitless
> > number of situations.
> >
> > Also, don't forget that you saw only a snippet. 
> There
> > is other code that builds the browse format, and
> > handles the left-right scrolling.
> >
> > Jeff Harrison
> >
> 
> I understand, although, I'm pretty sure the
> application Mark wants this for
> is something for the web... not needing any kind of
> browse code, just plain
> lookup... and yes, I didn't mention it, but my
> variable lookup code is also
> on a CALL table. All I wondered about was why it
> sounded like you thought
> you had to create a processing table on-the-fly so
> to speak just to GOSUB
> one of 36 lines. All clear now.
> 
> John
> 
> And PS yes, it is a cumbersome group of lines to
> write the first time, but
> with F8,C,ENTER,ENTER it only takes about 2 or 3
> minutes to write even that
> first time. :-)
> 

Yes, or in my case y,y,p,p,p... (etc.)

:-)

Jeff Harrison
jeffaharrison at yahoo.com

Author of JHExport and JHImport the fastest and
easiest way to generate code for filepro exports and
imports.

 



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail