variable lookups possible?

[John Esak]

>
> > John
> >
>
> Sorry, I guess I was not clear.  My generic lookup
> processing does not build another processing table.
> What I should have said was that there are two ways to
> do this that I can think of.  #1 The cumbersome way
> that you describe is what I am doing in the call
> table.  #2 is to build processing that builds
> processing.
>
> Of course, as you are aware, the beauty of making this
> a call table is that I only need to write the
> cumbersome code once, and I can use it in a limitless
> number of situations.
>
> Also, don't forget that you saw only a snippet.  There
> is other code that builds the browse format, and
> handles the left-right scrolling.
>
> Jeff Harrison
>

I understand, although, I'm pretty sure the application Mark wants this for
is something for the web... not needing any kind of browse code, just plain
lookup... and yes, I didn't mention it, but my variable lookup code is also
on a CALL table. All I wondered about was why it sounded like you thought
you had to create a processing table on-the-fly so to speak just to GOSUB
one of 36 lines. All clear now.

John

And PS yes, it is a cumbersome group of lines to write the first time, but
with F8,C,ENTER,ENTER it only takes about 2 or 3 minutes to write even that
first time. :-)