New server migration

scooter6 at gmail.com scooter6 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 06:57:00 PST 2019


okay thanks


On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:39 AM filePro <filepro.mail at gmail.com> wrote:

> Copy first and as long as you have the proper fp supplied libraries,
> fppath and p files it should work...but
> some of those files end up in different places depending on the OS layout
> and the install determines that for you.
> So copy first, try filePro, if it doesn't work, do an install which will
> hurt nothing and fix anything needed.
>
> Bill
>
> On 2/4/2019 7:26 PM, scooter6--- via Filepro-list wrote:
> > So after the file system change etc
> > Can I simply copy the /u directory from existing server to the new server
> > or do I need to have fP install media and run fpinstall and then copy
> data
> > files over?
> > thanks all
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:03 PM scooter6 at gmail.com <scooter6 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> haha duly noted Mark
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:57 PM Fairlight via Filepro-list <
> >> filepro-list at lists.celestial.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> All I can say is that I would never willingly use ext4.  It has issues.
> >>> Past everything I've said thus far on the matter, you're getting into
> paid
> >>> "re-research the comparisons of merits and detractors between valid
> >>> current
> >>> filesystems" territory, which is well beyond the scope of this list.
> >>>
> >>> You can totally do whatever you like with it.  I'm not being paid to
> >>> ensure
> >>> it works until OS End-of-Life and possibly beyond, so it's not really
> my
> >>> problem.  It's your box to enjoy or suffer through as you see fit.  ;)
> >>>
> >>> m->
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 06:44:02PM -0500, scooter6 at gmail.com thus
> spoke:
> >>>>     Mark,
> >>>>     So this really would only apply to the /u filesystem (that is
> 3.9TB)
> >>>>     where fP and data will be
> >>>>     The others can remain ext4 with no issues ? Or just best to
> convert
> >>> all
> >>>>     ext4 file systems to XFS?
> >>>>
> >>>>     On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:10 PM Fairlight via Filepro-list
> >>>>     <[1]filepro-list at lists.celestial.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>       It really depends whether you're using 64-bit or 32-bit filePro
> >>>>       binaries.
> >>>>       If you're using 64-bit, you're fine in any event.  If you're
> using
> >>>>       32-bit,
> >>>>       I suspect you may run into inode number issues.  I'd have to
> look
> >>>>       up how
> >>>>       ext4 handles its internal structure, and see if it's BTree+ as
> well
> >>>>       in
> >>>>       order to say definitively.  Or do some testing.
> >>>>       I would -never- willingly recommend ext4.  The problem with
> ext4
> >>> is
> >>>>       that it
> >>>>       has a static inode table.  If you create a filesystem of 'x'
> size
> >>>>       (say
> >>>>       100GB), by default it allocates 'z' inodes.  It's a steady
> default
> >>>>       relationship between filesystem size and inode count.  Two
> >>> problems
> >>>>       with
> >>>>       this being static:
> >>>>       1) If you use heavily heirarchical filesystem structures for
> >>> storage
> >>>>       of
> >>>>       data (think postfix-type queues or storage in nested
> directories),
> >>>>       you will
> >>>>       probably exhaust inode space well before you exhaust disk
> space.Â
> >>>>       You can
> >>>>       read 50% disk available, but be out of inodes and will be
> unable to
> >>>>       write
> >>>>       any new files.  You can add data to existing files, but once
> you
> >>>>       hit the
> >>>>       inode limit, you're done adding files or directories.  Which
> might
> >>>>       not be
> >>>>       so bad, if not for the fact that:
> >>>>       2) The inode table is so static that it is immutable,
> post-mkfs.Â
> >>>>       It
> >>>>       cannot be retuned by any means.  If you allocate 1TB worth of
> disk
> >>>>       to the
> >>>>       filesystem, then later add 2TB (which it will happily let you
> do,
> >>>>       and
> >>>>       which obviously LVM2 supports with ease), you will -still- only
> >>> have
> >>>>       the
> >>>>       same quantity of inodes to use under 3TB that you originally had
> >>>>       under
> >>>>       1TB.  There is no way around this, short of syncing the entire
> lot
> >>>>       to
> >>>>       another drive, redoing the whole filesystem from scratch with
> mkfs,
> >>>>       and
> >>>>       then syncing everything back. ext4 itself has no inherent
> >>>>       accomodation for
> >>>>       increasing the inode table size.  None.
> >>>>       Do yourself a huge favour, and rework it using XFS if you care
> >>> about
> >>>>       maintaining scalability.
> >>>>       m->
> >>>>       On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:08:24PM -0500, [2]scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>> thus
> >>>>       spoke:
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Just to add - I installed CentOS 7 on RAID 10 hardware
> RAID
> >>>>       on the new
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Dell PowerEdge
> >>>>       >Â  Â  I have the OS installed at this point and this is as far
> as
> >>>>       I've gotten
> >>>>       >Â  Â  The server has four (4) 2TB NLSAS hot plug hard drives
> >>>>       >Â  Â  I installed all filesystems as ext4 -- I allowed Centos
> to
> >>>>       partition
> >>>>       >Â  Â  automatically this leaves with a 3.9TB /u file system
> that
> >>> is
> >>>>       ext4
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Would you recommend a different filesystem?
> >>>>       >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:36 PM Scott Walker via
> Filepro-list
> >>>>       >Â  Â  <[1][3]filepro-list at lists.celestial.com> wrote:
> >>>>       >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Mark,
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Brian White was nice enough to help us out with this
> last
> >>>>       year.
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  This is from my notes:
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  CentOS Version 7ÃÂ  Installation Issues
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â
> >>>>
> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  --------
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â
> >>>>       --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  You must have libtermcap.so.2 installed!
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Ã On CentOS 7 you mustÃÂ  first install libc.so.6
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  ÃÂ  ÃÂ  ÃÂ  ÃÂ  yum install libc.so.6
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Then install:
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  ÃÂ  ÃÂ  ÃÂ  ÃÂ  rpm -ivh
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  compat-libtermcap-2.0.8-50flt.el7.centos.i686.rpm
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  The above file was provided by Brian.ÃÂ  I can email
> you
> >>> a
> >>>>       copy if
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  desired.
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Regards,
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Scott Walker
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  [2][4]scott.walker at ramsystemscorp.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  -----Original Message-----
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  From: Filepro-list
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â
> >>>>       [mailto:
> >>> [3]filepro-list-bounces+scottwalker=ramsystemscorp.com at lists
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  .celestial.
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  com] On Behalf Of Fairlight via Filepro-list
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Sent: Monday, February 4, 2019 1:58 PM
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  To: [4][5]filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Subject: Re: New server migration
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  My previous comments about XFS were for 32-bit
> >>>>       binaries.ÃÂ  The bit
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  depth is
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  important, as even 6.0.0 comes in both 32-bit and
> >>>>       64-bit.ÃÂ  If
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  you're running
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  64-bit, you can use inode64 on any filesystem size,
> and
> >>> it
> >>>>       shouldn't
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  cause
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  issues.
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  If you're running 64-bit binaries, compat-libtermcap
> may
> >>>>       still be an
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  issue
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  (probably is).ÃÂ  I'd have to revisit that directly to
> >>>>       confirm or
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  deny.ÃÂ  I
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  remember that the i686 architecture build target did
> not
> >>>>       exist in
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  the spec
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  file I got from the official SRPM, but that's only
> >>>>       necessary if you
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  run
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  32-bit binaries.ÃÂ  The package itself likely still
> needs
> >>>>       to be built
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  properly, so you're not relying on what I remember as
> >>>>       being the
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  default
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  broken configuration.
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  m->
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:02:34AM -0500, scooter6---
> via
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Filepro-list thus
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  spoke:
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > To clarify, this is with fP 5.6.10R4
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:22 AM [5][6]
> >>> scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > <[6][7]scooter6 at gmail.com>
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > wrote:
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > Just purchased our new Dell PowerEdge server that
> I
> >>>>       have
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  installed
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > CentOS
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > 7 on
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > Am migrating from older Dell PowerEdge that has
> >>> Centos
> >>>>       5.10 on
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  it
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > Is there a 'recipe book' anyone may have on steps
> to
> >>>>       migrate all
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  data
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  etc?
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > Can a simple copy of the fp directories etc do the
> >>>>       trick or does
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  the
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > new server need to go through fpinstall ?
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > I know there are significant changes in CentOS
> from
> >>>>       5.10 to 6
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  and
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > then to
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > 7 but in what I've read I don't think there too
> much
> >>>>       of a
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  concern
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > for purposes of what we do here
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > Curious if anyone has done this similar migration
> and
> >>>>       what to
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  watch
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > out for or best steps in order to make this as
> >>>>       seamless as
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  possible
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > Thanks for any insight
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > Scott
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > > PDM
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML
> >>>>       attachment was
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > scrubbed...
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > URL:
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â
> >>>>       <[7][8]
> >>> http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachmen
> >>>>       ts/
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  20190
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > 204/1b6775da/attachment.html>
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > _______________________________________________
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > Filepro-list mailing list
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > [8][9]Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  >
> >>>>       [9][10]
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  --
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Audio panton, cogito singularis.
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  _______________________________________________
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Filepro-list mailing list
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  [10][11]Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â
> >>>>       [11][12]
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  _______________________________________________
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Filepro-list mailing list
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  [12][13]Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â  Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> >>>>       >Â  Â  Â
> >>>>       [13][14]
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>       >
> >>>>       > References
> >>>>       >
> >>>>       >Â  Â  1. mailto:[15]filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  2. mailto:[16]scott.walker at ramsystemscorp.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  3. mailto:[17]filepro-list-bounces%2Bscottwalker
> >>>>       >Â  Â  4. mailto:[18]filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  5. mailto:[19]scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  6. mailto:[20]scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  7.
> >>>>       [21]
> >>> http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/
> >>>>       20190
> >>>>       >Â  Â  8. mailto:[22]Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â  9.
> >>>>       [23]http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>       >Â  Â 10. mailto:[24]Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â 11.
> >>>>       [25]http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>       >Â  Â 12. mailto:[26]Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       >Â  Â 13.
> >>>>       [27]http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>       --
> >>>>       Audio panton, cogito singularis.
> >>>>       _______________________________________________
> >>>>       Filepro-list mailing list
> >>>>       [28]Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>       Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> >>>>       [29]http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>
> >>>> References
> >>>>
> >>>>     1. mailto:filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>     2. mailto:scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>>>     3. mailto:filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>     4. mailto:scott.walker at ramsystemscorp.com
> >>>>     5. mailto:filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>     6. mailto:scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>>>     7. mailto:scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>>>     8.
> http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/
> >>>>     9. mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    10. http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>    11. mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    12. http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>    13. mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    14. http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>    15. mailto:filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    16. mailto:scott.walker at ramsystemscorp.com
> >>>>    17. mailto:filepro-list-bounces%252Bscottwalker
> >>>>    18. mailto:filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    19. mailto:scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>>>    20. mailto:scooter6 at gmail.com
> >>>>    21.
> >>> http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/20190
> >>>>    22. mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    23. http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>    24. mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    25. http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>    26. mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    27. http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>>    28. mailto:Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>>>    29. http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Audio panton, cogito singularis.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Filepro-list mailing list
> >>> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> >>> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >>>
> >>
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/20190204/c584f14f/attachment.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Filepro-list mailing list
> > Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> > http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/20190205/56754a78/attachment.html>


More information about the Filepro-list mailing list