Nested Calls

[Richard D. Williams]

Guys, guys, it's my bad for bring it up.

I thought it may have been mixed up with the thread on " attaching 
document images to a filepro file".

Very Sorry,

Richard

On 5/3/2018 8:56 PM, Jose Lerebours via Filepro-list wrote:
> Yeah, go ahead and wait ... lol
>
>
> On 05/03/2018 09:38 PM, Fairlight via Filepro-list wrote:
>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:56:52PM -0400, Jose Lerebours via 
>> Filepro-list thus spoke:
>>> On 05/03/2018 07:15 PM, Fairlight via Filepro-list wrote:
>>>>> BTW I do not know how this thread got to clickable links.  I will 
>>>>> have
>>>>> to re-read.
>>>> "Jose."
>>> Not really ... but as it is said round the political arenas: what
>>> difference does it make?
>> I've never heard any politician pose that rhetorical question if they
>> weren't the guilty party.
>>
>> And yes, really.  You point me at the post where someone other than
>> you brought up clickable links.  I don't believe it exists. It's all
>> searchable on http://lists.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list if 
>> you want
>> to provide backup for your claim.  So go ahead.  I'll wait.
>>
>> The first mention I see of the hot/clickable links in the thread is 
>> yours:
>>
>> SOURCE 1:
>> http://dorsai-01.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/2018-May/034511.html 
>>
>>
>> There's zero mention prior to that of any such thing.  The thread
>> originated with Ron in this post:
>>
>> SOURCE 2:
>> http://dorsai-01.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/2018-May/034508.html 
>>
>>
>> I sure as hell made no reference to clickable links, and your message 
>> which
>> did was a response to my post, which was a response to the OP. so your
>> phrasing in source #1 seemed as weird a segue out of the blue then as it
>> does tonight.
>>
>> Then, as a matter of searchable public record, you -explicitly- said you
>> were trying to bait someone (presumably Bob, since he did pipe up) into
>> chiming in:
>>
>> SOURCE 3:
>> http://dorsai-01.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/2018-May/034522.html 
>>
>>
>> So yes, REALLY.  I can source my claims, or I'd qualify them pretty
>> explicitly as opinion.  That's a long-standing habit of mine which I 
>> rarely
>> break.  Can you source yours?  Luck with that; I've already checked, 
>> and I
>> see no evidence to support your version of history.
>>
>> I'm trying to discern if you're gaslighting, or simply not with-it 
>> enough
>> to know what you're talking about any longer.  The point is probably
>> academic, as you're full of it either way, IMNSHO.  The proof to 
>> illustrate
>> as much is readily available.  Hell, I've seen Trump go longer before
>> contradicting himself.  You're not even trying anymore.
>>
>> mark->
>
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com