New filePro releases

[Jose Lerebours]

You must be a sad person to live with or be around ... Go out, make a 
few friends ... computers are not true company.

Remind me to ask you to call me "idiot" if we ever cross path.  Mind 
you, I am barely 140lbs at 5.3 (light, short little thing).

You are so lost in you dark box and lonely world one has to wonder ...

Enough of that shit - you are not, you have never been and will never be 
a developer.  Period.  End of that!

You can only wish to be one and in your self destructive frustration, 
you constantly lash out while grabbing on to things like "controlled 
environment" and twist that the way you did.  I said "controlled 
environment", not "prison", like the world you live in.

You are so clueless about what a shopping cart is that you could not 
even write your own if you wanted to (wait, you did want one but were 
not able to write it so opted for PayPal).

Mark, I get a kick out of this and if not because I have work to do, I 
will fuck with your head all day.  Believe me, you are too easy and 
predictable.  Now, go on and fix you stupid, shitty ass excuse for a web 
site.  $15 buys you a template that beats your existing site - of 
course, you will be left with the challenge of understanding how to put 
the $15 template to use.

Clean your own house before you critic other people's places!

Here, I found an excellent article ... read it ... by the end of it, you 
should be a much better web designer

http://www.fairlite.com/fc/articles/web_design_001.html 8-)





On 10/20/2016 12:36 AM, Fairlight via Filepro-list wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:25:31PM -0400, Jose Lerebours via Filepro-list thus spoke:
>> Sorry man, I really did not mean to ruin your big night.  I just
> Ruin?  That was one of the bigger laughs I've had all day!
>
>> That said, I am sure none of them send you to PayPal - they keep you
>> within their controlled environment.  Yeah, I left that piece out, I
>> meant to say, unless you developed your own - I know, why re-invent
>> the wheel!?!
> Oh, the, "I don't think you understand what I meant because I didn't say
> everything I meant," argument.  No, I entirely understood what was said.
> If you omitted key points, that's entirely on you.
>
> Additionally, your ignorance is showing -again-.  You believe a web
> environment is "controlled", and someone "keeps" you -anywhere-?
> Erm...Control-W, *boom*, tab closed, I'm done.  Or I just navigate
> away.
>
> I've "walked" out of the shopping carts of vendors who pissed me off by
> making it ridiculously hard to spend money on them, notably when they want
> to refuse to ship to a P.O. Box.  NewEgg, regrettably gone.  TigerDirect,
> gone.  I could name more.  All had what you seem to consider "controlled"
> environments.
>
> They had zero control; I was out of there when I wanted to be out of there.
> There's no more or less control with PayPal's cart, and there's a hell of a
> lot less overhead, especially as all the PCI compliance rubbish is on them.
> I've -zero- regrets over using them.  It was the right call over a decade
> ago, and it's an even better call now, since the PCI standard has gotten
> even more stringent.
>
> I don't sell rubbish, nor do I sell impulse buy items.  Between the
> specialised nature of the software and the pricing, someone is either
> serious about purchasing from me, or they're not.  PayPal's native offering
> suits my model just fine.  Honestly, if PayPal's cart system (whose
> "Continue Shopping" link works just fine, by the way), confuses someone
> -that- badly, I'm probably better off -not- having them buy my software.
> If they can't manage to work PayPal's shopping cart, or hire someone who
> can work it for them, I'm likely going to massively take it on the chin in
> support overhead, and they're best avoided from the start.  Consider it an
> IQ test, or customer pre-screening; take your pick.
>
>> You got to be crazy if you think I'm gonna go through each of those
>> links!   Boy, where do you find the time?
> Dude, it took five minutes to disprove your idiotic assertion.  Unlike
> you, I actually tend to -prove- my claims when I make them (or at least
> make sure they can't be readily disproven), so I bothered to take a couple
> minutes to make sure my facts were unassailable.  You could do worse than
> to learn from that example.  They call the concept 'due diligence'.
>
> The only thing that's more incredible to me than your ridiculous claims
> is that you're fool enough to keep coming back to try and save face after
> you've clearly and irrevocably lost.  There's no saving face, here; you're
> flat-out -wrong-.  Again.  Yet.  Still.
>
> And I feel no shame at all for calling you on it; you're flat-out doing
> this to yourself.  I've heard of people taking enough rope, but you're on
> your seventeenth rope -factory-.
>
> If you were going to try and take a poke at me, you'd think you'd at least
> try to have your ducks in a row when making the attempt.  I mean, you could
> at least make it challenging once in a while.
>
> mark->