File specs?

[Fairlight]

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:43:18PM -0400, Kenneth Brody thus spoke:
> On 8/30/2016 5:49 PM, Fairlight via Filepro-list wrote:
> [....]
> >That's just lovely, after that smarmy little answer Ken initially coughed
> >up.  Really helpful, Ace.  Thanks for the excellent use of my time.
> [...]
> 
> You said "I've been through all the options, and damned if I see
> it."  I gave you the links to click.  How is that "smarmy"?

It becomes "smarmy" when you know damned well that I don't have a customer
account of my own, and you give me a link to a paywalled page Ä something
you -knew- full-well wouldn't be helpful unless I jumped through hoops on a
client's account.

The fact that you blurted it out without ensuring that -all- the files were
actually accounted for simply adds insult to injury.

Actually, double-checking the dictionary, I'm not sure "smarmy" is the
correct word I wanted to use.  I've heard it used by others in that
context, but apparently I was listening to the wrong people using it
incorrectly, and never checked on them before now.  I'm at a loss to
figure out the exact -single- word I want; long day, vocabulary offline.

"Sarcastically and sardonically unhelpful," is going to be the closest
translation to how it read to me.

m->
-- 
Audio panton, cogito singularis.