Missing line
Richard Kreiss
rkreiss at verizon.net
Tue Aug 2 12:32:39 PDT 2016
Jose,
You are over thinking.
Simple report output.
Sort 1 - primary break 4 digit #
Sort 2 - member # break 2 aging printed at this break. Totals held in dummy fields. No arrays.
After the missing first record everything prints properly
Richard
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Jose Lerebours via Filepro-list <filepro-list at lists.celestial.com> wrote:
>
> One thing comes to mind ... Say if you have an form where output is done via use of dummy variables such as
>
>
> *aa *ab *ac *ad
>
>
> and these are in turn associated or populated by use of an array like output(280,*):aa or similar - The values are populated by another dummy variable like ln(2,.0) ( output(ln)=" " ... ) so, if counter is set at wrong level, you can have the problem you describe, especially so if the counter is conditionally set.
>
> Also, if you are printing a detail or summary type of form may have an effect since the missing record may or not trigger a break on your report thus not printing at all.
>
> A snapshot of what the form looks like (as defined) may help but then again, tough to do via list.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jose
>
>
>
>> On 08/02/2016 02:28 PM, Richard Kreiss via Filepro-list wrote:
>> Just the first record for some of these codes not all.
>>
>> Richard
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>>> On Aug 2, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Kenneth Brody <kenbrody at spamcop.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 8/1/2016 2:06 PM, Richard Kreiss wrote:
>>>> A report which breaks on a code number doesn't print the first record selected for that code.
>>> It doesn't print the first record for every code, or just for the first code?
>>>
>>>> This is an A/R report and it happens for the same code but different person.
>>> So it works for some people, but not others?
>>>
>>>> There is no print command in the code as all other records print.
>>> The fact that the other records print does not preclude the existence of a "print" command.
>>>
>>>> Any suggestions as to what to look for?
>>> I would start by verifying that there is, in fact, no "print". (And if there is, figure out why the first record doesn't execute it.)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kenneth Brody
>> _______________________________________________
>> Filepro-list mailing list
>> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
>> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list