sockets

[Ed Hilovsky]

No, just drowning in their logic. Socket licenses tied to filepro processes.
WOW. What a concept. Don't know of ANY other system that does that. I
thought that is why socketclose() was invented.

 -- 

Ed Hilovsky 
LGF Computers 

Main Office   : (724) 463-7633 
Toll Free         : (800) 653-8479 
Fax Number : (866) 448-5415 
Cellular           : (412) 289-1773 

email  lgf at lgfcomputers.net 


-----Original Message-----
From: filepro-list-bounces+lgf=lgfcomputers.net at lists.celestial.com
[mailto:filepro-list-bounces+lgf=lgfcomputers.net at lists.celestial.com] On
Behalf Of Jay Ashworth
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 5:09 PM
To: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
Subject: Re: sockets

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Hilovsky" <lgf at lgfcomputers.net>

> Not sure how you could misread this:
> 
> If you only are using it for sending requests and getting a reply and 
> then shutting the socket down, it usually is very quick and available 
> for someone else
> 
> It says shutting the socket down, never says closing the filepro 
> process.

Then it's factually incorrect, yes.

> Additionally, odd that you even need a socket just to make a client 
> connection to a server. The server can count correctly when a
> socketclose() function is used.

Well now, here you go into deeper water...

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC
2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover
DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647
1274
_______________________________________________
Filepro-list mailing list
Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list