ATTN: Bill Randall - Re: FW: Lovely release spam...

[Fairlight]

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:29:08AM -0500, daN baueR thus spoke:
> I only received 5. But who's counting. ;)

Me.  Up to 7 now, and growing more peeved with each one.

They're -still- coming in from originating times as far back as 00:26 CST.

Which tells me fP-Tech isn't responsible enough to do the correct thing and
TURN OFF the MTA on the machine they used, purge the outstanding queue, and
then turn it back on.  Any admin worthy of the title would have done exactly
that, the second this was discovered.  That I'm still getting these about
two hours after I just saw Bill ask me to forgive it, frankly ticks me off
more than a little.

Bill:  Here are the relevant Received headers from the latest message:

Received: from [192.168.23.100] (helo=filepro.org)
        by fptech.com with esmtp
        (envelope-from <filepro at filepro.org>)
        id 1TiR83-0002aa-KM
        for fairlite at fairlite.com; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:48:15 -0500
Received: from fpmain (unknown [127.0.0.1])
        by filepro.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5E63664B
        for <fairlite at fairlite.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:26:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from filepro at localhost)
        by fpmain (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id qBB5QCrw022781
        for fairlite at fairlite.com; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:26:12 -0500 (EST)

So get someone to go shut off the MTAs on fpmain and 192.168.23.100, purge
all outstanding messages, and fire them back up again.  My money is on the
.23.100 machine being the culprit, given the time differential between
sending and processing.

This has gone past mere typo, and veered straight into inconsiderate
incompetence.  It's still originating from a machine you control, and thus
you have the ability to rectify it - yet you apparently have not.  Give me
one -good- reason to forgive that, when you're still letting it happen.

mark->