@AF Clarification Needed...

[Kenneth Brody]

On 10/6/2011 1:11 AM, Stanley - stanlyn-com wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
>>> (In other words, if you left the third I2, than a reference to I1 means
> the third I1, and I3 means the third I3, and so on.
> This helped solve my problem.

I take it to mean that you renamed the fields so they all belong to the same 
group now?

What about your version of the file which you claim that I2, D2, Q2, and so 
on, "work" as long as the fields are defined contiguously?  Have you 
contacted fpsupport to arrange sending them a file to demonstrate this?

[...]

-- 
Kenneth Brody