@AF Clarification Needed...
Stanley - stanlyn-com
stanley at stanlyn.com
Mon Oct 3 08:25:46 PDT 2011
Hi,
Does the @AF function and behavior work the same whether the table is
structured as in table A and table B below? I am having problems with @AF
when using it with table A below, and NO problems with table B. Define
Proc=5.0.14D4, sco OpenSrv5
Table A (with each associated field in a block where they are NOT next to
each other)
90- I2) Item #1
91- Q2) Qty #1
92- M2) UOM #1
93- D2) Desc #1
94- G2) GL #1
95- T2) Total Cost #1
96- *
97- *
98- I2) Item #2
99- Q2) Qty #1
100- M2) UOM #2
101- D2) Desc #2
102- G2) GL #2
103- T2) Total Cost #2
Table B (with each associated field next to each other)
38- D1) PayDate #1
39- D1) PayDate #2
40- D1) PayDate #3
41- D1) PayDate #4
42- D1) PayDate #5
43- D1) PayDate #6
44- D1) PayDate #7
45- D1) PayDate #8
46- D1) PayDate #9
47- D1) PayDate #10
48- *
49- G1) G/L Code #1
50- G1) G/L Code #2
51- G1) G/L Code #3
52- G1) G/L Code #4
53- G1) G/L Code #5
54- G1) G/L Code #6
55- G1) G/L Code #7
56- G1) G/L Code #8
57- G1) G/L Code #9
58- G1) G/L Code #10
And yes, I know how to normalize. This is legacy code that needs some small
changes to the @AF stuff.
Thanks, Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/20111003/49ae2b67/attachment.html
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list