Dimensioned Arrays
Kenneth Brody
kenbrody at spamcop.net
Wed Apr 20 10:37:59 PDT 2011
On 4/19/2011 8:13 PM, smittyusn1 at bellsouth.net wrote:
> Maybe more people would pose questions on this list if they didn't judged by
> the exalted points master. I posted it here 3 times that only one element
> of my new array was being filled in. Could be you missed that part.
Yes, you posted the symptom. In fact, that's pretty much all you posted.
Not once did you ever answer any question asked of you regarding the code
that does the assigment(s). In fact, the only code you posted were two DIM
statements, and one of the assignments that did work. You never posted
anything even remotely related to the code that didn't work.
> Maybe Laura Brody would post her fix here with an explanation that will meet
> with your approval.
Since you brought it up...
I happen to have an "in" with Laura, and I can tell you that the problem was
exactly what I guessed at in my first reply to you:
> The A group and the B group are not related. If, for example, you have
> something in @WEFA1 processing, when you refer to anything A0 through A9,
> you refer to the same instance. However, if you refer to anything in B0 and
> B1, you will only get the first instance.
You were trying to assign to B0 and B1 within @WLFA4 processing.
BTW, your problem had nothing to do with arrays. (Though the solution did
use them.)
[...]
--
Kenneth Brody
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list