Dimensioned Arrays

[Richard Kreiss]

Richard
Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 17, 2011, at 1:03 PM, <smittyusn1 at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Let me see if I can explain this better.
> 
> Cust x  has a 15 items max Invoice with a dimensioned array of  10 
> associated fields that do the code lookup, price, ext, tax, etc.  That works 
> good,  now he wants to add a LIST price for each item + Extended List with a 
> total.
> 
> When he Escapes to save his invoice I would like to gosub to a new 
> Dimensioned Array (b0-b9) of 15 possible items, find the code  in his 
> inventory grab the list price, extend it and return.   When I try that now 
> all I get is the first code + list price.
> 
> Windows 7,  filePro 5.0
> 
> Wayne Smith
> Port Orange, Florida
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Kenneth Brody
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 11:20 AM
> To: smittyusn1 at bellsouth.net
> Cc: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subject: Re: Dimensioned Arrays
> 
> On 4/17/2011 9:05 AM, smittyusn1 at bellsouth.net wrote:
>> Experts,
>> 
>> I have an Invoice file,  cust x has been using for 10 years,  15 items on
>> his invoice.    I have associated fields a0 thru a9 for elements within 
>> the
>> invoice (define) itself,  this works great.  I have tried and tried to ADD
>> to some new elements ....example b0 thru b1 (15 of them), just two things 
>> I
>> need that he wants to add NEW to his invoice....LIST PRICE and EXTENDED 
>> LIST
>> PRICE, (I can use quantity field a1 to extend list  price to show what the
>> his customer is saving on the printed Invoice.  (extended field total =
>> a1*b1) then add them up for a total.  The fields are contiguous in the 
>> real
>> fields.
>> 
>> When I do an invoice and assign data .....it always fills in the first 
>> field
>> in the array  b0 ....next time it overwrites it with fresh data from the
>> lookup into the Inventory file, without filling in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc.
>> real field on the invoice.
>> 
>> Windows 7,  filePro 5.0
>> 
>> What am I doing wrong ?  I hope I explained it right......Thanks ahead of
>> time.
> 
> I'm not sure what this has to do with arrays, an mentioned in the subject,
> since you never refer to arrays in the body of the message.  (Except for a
> strange reference to "the array b0".)
> 
> The A group and the B group are not related.  If, for example, you have
> something in @WEFA1 processing, when you refer to anything A0 through A9,
> you refer to the same instance.  However, if you refer to anything in B0 and
> B1, you will only get the first instance.
> 
> -- 
> Kenneth Brody 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Subscription Changes
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list