OT: politcal [in]correctness (ABC Computing): Filepro-list Digest, Vol 80, Issue 49

[Steve Parker]

Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:34:27 -0400
From: "John Esak" <john at valar.com>
Subject: RE: political [in]correctness
To: <filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
Message-ID: <201009270134.o8R1YmsI049944 at admin114.securesites.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

> No, JP, I disagree... It's no defile of this list. It will keep some
action
> when other things get low... Which they do.

[Steve Parker] For what it is worth, my vote is "YES"!!  Although there are
many forums out there, most of them are quite boring because the quality of
the comments is not very good. Folks on this forum are some of the brighter
out there! And if there is one thing I do enjoy is good political
discussion!! 

Most especially right now. Mr. Obama most certainly does NOT represent my
interests, nor those of the Country I have come to know, nor those of our
Founders as I understand them from the Constitution and the Federalists
Papers.

I have two short points to "bring to the table" as it were!


#1 -- In spite of the possibility I could be labeled a "birther" I will
relate the summary of a story that has popped up just today. I'm sure most
of you are aware of the rising "controversy" over Obama's Birth Certificate,
and as such, his birth-right to run for President.

Most of my college friends scoff at this discourse, as well as many of my
friends and associates. I have not and do not now embrace this issue as
valid, only that the questions seem to have merit and are worth further
investigation.

It appears that the source of the "pass" / approval for Obama's citizenship
issues came out of Hawaii right from the beginning at the behest of a power
in the Democrat Party.

Surprised? Is this a valid issue or one that should be dropped?

#2 -- It appears to me that there are AT LEAST two standards of law in this
country, especially if we are talking about the enforcement of Federal Laws.

Today more information was released by a group following the Black Panther
Voter Intimidation Case. I'm sure you all remember! The one that went no
where because all charges were dropped! Well, according to this group, it
appears that the decision to drop the charges and NOT prosecute came from
O's people. Why? They did not want to enforce a Civil Rights Law against a
minority group.

Here is one of many links that provides many more details. What say you?

http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/09/26/the-dojs-black-panthers-woes-a-set-up-
with-an-assist-from-inside/

Sorry if the arrives after the Midnight deadline! If so, then good
discussion for next Sunday!


sparker


> There is no problem for anyone seeing a note on Sundays only that says OT:
> to just press delete... Even you.

> Of course there arethousands of other forums expressly for the purpose...
> But they are *other* people... I like the people here. I want to learn >
more
> about the people here. It's not so much the content. Plus, I expressly
> suggested that it be "funny" and observant ... I don't see why you feel it
> would become vituperative.  It's the idea that all political discourse
> *must* do that which is so anoying to all of us these days. There was a
> time, badck in the 50's early 60's when you could adamently disagree with
> someone and still not resort to fillifying them. Just because someone
> disagrees with you , it doesn't make them the devil... The younger crowd
> needs to learn that... We have to teach them if no one else will.  Our
> country includes all sides of an argument, there is no reason to run any
one
> side out on a rail.

> The whole purpose of T: is so you can press delete without being bothered
to
> rea the message. Let's use that funtionality.  I do not read lots of OT:
> threads if they are subject titled correctly.

> If this is voting... I vote let's do it.

> John