abusive signature block

[Richard Kreiss]

Top post:

My Outlook is not set to  automatically install a signature block.  I have a
number of different signature blocks set up and manually install one prior
to sending an email if I want a formal signature block.

I am now down to using 2 email addresses from my previous 6.  Cablevision
closed down my email accounts, after 5 1/2 years.  Closed the account in
March of 05.  I discontinued my EarthLink account last year as I was not
using dial-up while traveling.  


Richard Kreiss
GCC Consulting
rkreiss at gccconsulting.net
  




> -----Original Message-----
> From: filepro-list-bounces+rkreiss=verizon.net at lists.celestial.com
[mailto:filepro-list-
> bounces+rkreiss=verizon.net at lists.celestial.com] On Behalf Of John Esak
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:27 PM
> To: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subject: RE: abusive signature block
> 
> Wall, I realize it is nothing to judge standards by... But Outlook does
NOT
> work that way. Signatures (or what they call a signature ) only pops into
> New messages being sent.  A reply will not pop them up, just the original
> message and the ">quoting" setup previously.
> 
> Now, maybe other MUA's consider signatures something that gets appended
> *after* the user presses SEND... As must be the case with the MrMailman
> software of this forum. It appends the Forum stuff... You never see it.
> 
> Outlook Prepends the signature on a blank page and you get to keep it,
> modify it, push it up or down... Lose it, etc.
> 
> The only reason I bring this up, is if George uses this type of software,
he
> could easily just dump the large signature when he is sending to the forum
> and let it ride for all else.  I don't think his boss would mind this...
> He's not doing "business" with messag4es sent here.  For that matter, how
> many of us actually *have* a personal email address and a business email
> address?  Most of us use just one to cover it all, and yes, I know this is
> probably not the best way to do things. I'm just saying it works out that
> way. Could you imagine Bill not using Bill at celestial.com or Tom not using
> Tom at microlite.com for personal emailing.  What the heck would personal
> emailing be anyway.
> 
> Oh wait, you mean that porn stuff I get late at night through my yahoo
> acc0ount??
> 
> ... Never mind ... (said in his best Rosanne Rosanadana voice... :-)
> 
> John
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: filepro-list-bounces+john=valar.com at lists.celestial.com
> > [mailto:filepro-list-bounces+john=valar.com at lists.celestial.co
> m] On Behalf Of Jean-Pierre A. Radley
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:51 AM
> > To: FilePro Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: abusive signature block
> >
> > John Esak propounded (on Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:37:35AM -0400):
> > | Don't signatures only pop up on outgoing original mail...
> > Not on replies...
> >
> > I think if I really twisted and contorted and strained, I
> > could configure
> > some such behavior for mutt, but other than that I've never
> > heard of an
> > MUA that didn't append one's defined signature for every message.
> >
> > --
> > JP
> > _______________________________________________
> > Filepro-list mailing list
> > Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> > http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list