lookup problem

[Bruce Easton]

Oh - yes - I have run into that before.   -Bruce

On 8/4/10 11:04 AM, Bill Randall wrote:
> On 8/4/2010 10:53 AM, Bruce Easton wrote:
>    
>> Richard - ok, so you're saying field 16 should have the same value as
>> "lv" from your test file.
>>
>> But if you're getting different results between d/rlcerk, then I would
>> think that should be your first concern.  Either 1. your tok isn't built
>> from what you currently have in your prc, or 2. your dclerk is a
>> different version from your rclerk, or 3. your environment/target
>> 'neighborhood' is somehow different between how you're calling
>> dclerk/rlcerk - either for the executable itself, or for the area of
>> databases they are looking at, or 4. your not allotting enough "t" size
>> for tok to run with (but I think your error would definitely be
>> different), or 5. there truely is some but in fp.     I'll bet  that if
>> you're truely seeing different results between d/rclerk, then it's
>> either 1/2 or 3 from above.
>>
>> Brucen/listinfo/filepro-list
>>
>>      
> Could also be that the .tok file was not compiled with the matching
> automatic processing table.
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>
>
>