change size of two fields without increasing size of file
Dennis Malen
dmalen at malen.com
Wed Sep 9 17:26:29 PDT 2009
Mark,
You got it right. How did you have the perception to know that? You are a
very intuitive guy.
We are all so impressed with your sound logic.
On behalf of the list,
Thank you for being you.
Regards!
Dennis Malen
516.479.5912
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fairlight" <fairlite at fairlite.com>
To: <filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: change size of two fields without increasing size of file
> When asked his whereabouts on Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:16:49PM -0400,
> Dennis Malen took the fifth, drank it, and then slurred:
>> Ken,
>>
>> Over the years, we have restructured many files. They were small files
>> where
>> we had no exposure in the event it was corrupted. We always had a backup.
>>
>> When we restructure the subject file we will do a backup first.
>
> Let me guess, there was a question as to whether the restructure routine
> would perform the same on an important file rather than an unimportant
> file?
>
> How did you think ddefine would tell the difference?
>
> *eyeroll*
>
> mark->
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list