limiting browse based on login?

Fairlight fairlite at fairlite.com
Wed Sep 2 09:22:31 PDT 2009


Is it just me, or did Tom Aldridge say:
> 
> We own many restaurants, and our managers do everything from cash 
> control to inventory and ordering to employee database functions and 
> much more where we want to carefully control what records they have 
> access to, but then want all the data back in one file for creating 
> consolidated reports, etc. Works flawlessly day in and day out and the 
> end users see and know nothing other than "their" stuff.

If they can ever get access to the shell or to full *clerk, all bets are
off, as a qualified file is not "protected".

Never underestimate the intelligence or resourcefulness of your users.  All
it takes is one person with half a brain and a little willpower to bring
that crashing down.

As an example, I don't know if you still have and use WordPerfect, but
that had a shell-out capability.  That was one reason a bank downtown was
nowhere near as secure as they thought. they "thought" the had shell access
eliminated.  Wrong.  Well, that and not having a password on the "bin"
user...something covered in most every administration book back then.

There are lots of ways to a shell that people don't remember they have
exposure from.

mark->


More information about the Filepro-list mailing list