Problems with Sort/Selection processing on associated fields.

[Kenneth Brody]

Quoting Boaz Bezborodko (Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:26:08 -0500):
[...]
> OK, trying to keep track of the data by counting the occurrences doesn't
> work because a) they are sometimes entered out of order and b) there are
> sometimes blank fields in the middle.  This means that even though you
> can select a specific record from the index the Sort/Selection process
> cannot tell you which associated field is the one that that index points to.
>
> Am I wrong in thinking that this is a bug?

Short answer:  Yes.  :-)

Long answer:

What if more than one member of the group met the selection criteria?  What
if none of them did, but the record was selected because of some other "OR"
part of the selection set?

However, if you are also sorting on that group, then the selection will be
based solely on the individual members of the group as they are entered
into the sort, and @AF will point to that particular member.  (Of course,
the above two scenarios come into play as well.)

-- 
Kenneth Brody