SCO/Linux/Filepro consultant needed

[Fairlight]

>From inside the gravity well of a singularity, Seth A. Fischer, Esq.
shouted:
> This message may constitute attorney/client privilege and is intended
> only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This message
> may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient,
> or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited, and
> you are requested to please notify us immediately by telephone (315)
> 475-0000 and return the original message to us at the above address.

These always crack me up, once I actually got past the eyeroll factor and
started to look at what they say carefully!  Who actually -writes- these
inane boilerplates, and do they have even a remote grasp of elementary
reasoning?

POINT OF LOGIC:  If it arrived in -my- inbox, it was obviously addressed
to -me-, thus making me the entity to whom it was addressed.  (Duh.)
Therefore, not my problem that someone can't address things properly, and
I'd pretty much be free to do whatever I like with it.

It's really -not that hard- to use logic.  I'm amazed that so many
"professionals" will let such flimsy logic go out their "office doors", 
as it were.

mark->
-- 
"I'm not subtle. I'm not pretty, and I'll piss off a lot of people along
the way. But I'll get the job done" --Captain Matthew Gideon, "Crusade"