Facebook Application

Wed Dec 16 12:42:33 PST 2009

John Esak wrote Wednesday, December 16, 2009 3:05 PM:
> To: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> Subject: RE: Facebook Application
> 
> > 
> > FOr instance, <TBODY> didn't even exist back when fP 
> implemented this.
> > If you try doing a table without TBODY nowadays, it'll 
> never validate 
> > against strict XHTML.  You'd have to fix -every- 
> discrepancy in every 
> > tag
> 
> 
> 
> Hmmm, I thought <body> was in html 3.0.  But, your point is taken.
> 
> John
> 

No, <body> and <tbody> ---two different tags.  But using "html :tx"
for everything after opening the output document (until the 
output document needs closing) would cover using newer tags.
What I never considered was the need to have something before the 
<html..> tag as in Enrique's original post.  Unless some usage of 
fp's "html :cr :dt :tx" would give a workable equivalent, which I 
doubt, then sounds like using open and writeline might be the only 
way to go for him.  

Bruce

Bruce Easton
STN, Inc.