Speaking of fp html commands

[Tyler]

Fair enough.  From my perspective, it looks like fpcgi is failing to
run it at all, and as far as I know you haven't examined the logs
since we started out latest test runs and found that the new binary
you provided + config changes are still resulting in failures.
(perhaps our contractor has not kept us in the loop on your
involvement this time around?)

Since I can't really observe very well what fpcgi's actually doing,
there are bound to be inaccuracies in my understanding of it.  Either
way, the end result is the same - fpcgi and/or rreport are failing to
produce output, using the exact same data in the exact same
environment being run with the exact same commands, on 0.5% of our
trial runs.

Tyler

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Ron Kracht <rkracht at filegate.net> wrote:
> That is a misrepresentation of what is actually happening.  The logs clearly
> indicate that fpcgi is running rreport in every case- in a small number of
> cases rreport is exiting abnormally without producing the expected output.
>
> Ron Kracht
>
>