fpgroups.com: Revised chat room

[fp at casabellagallery.com]

Bob posted:

> Jay R. Ashworth wrote (on Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:46:35AM -0400):
> [snip]
> 
> | Actually, yes: community.
> | 
> | Aw, hell; I don't have the energy to be both informative and polite
> | after this long a day; would someone whose seen a 6-group newgroup bite
> | the dust hard please explain this to Jose?
> 
> Yeah, I'll bite.
> 
> fPtech already maintains a well organized forum on their site.
> 
> Why another one that won't have the eyes of fPtech folks watching it
> so well as they (might) watch the one of their own?
> 

Bob, for the same reason Microsoft, SCO and other big players have so
many supporting business partners.  fpTech should embrace this sorts of
things, it would not be business wise condemn it.  Won't you agree?

Additionally, if we have our own medium where their products are 
promoted and they are not responsible for the overhead, how is fpTech
to loose?  I think they stand to gain as they can use their resource
in bigger and better things than a silly old chat room and an 
antiquated web site.

It is good to see that nothing has changed and that the same 4 or 6
big dogs are always watching the gates and ready to kill any and all
tress-passers.

I am not going away.  I am not putting the site down. None of you
are going to change your position so I guess we are left with no 
choice but to accept the facts and let things fall where they may.

Good night guys!


Jose