SCO printing over TCP/IP
Brian K. White
brian at aljex.com
Thu Oct 18 10:11:50 PDT 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra at baylink.com>
To: <filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: SCO printing over TCP/IP
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 08:55:21AM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
>> Installation is just "unpack the tar in the root dir"
>
> Which, of course, actually means "do a tar tvf[z] and see what's going
> to be unpacked, and then unpack it under /tmp/whatever and look at it
> first."
>
> Cheers,
> -- jr 'paranoid? me?? :-)' a
>
> [No offense, Brian...]
None taken, I would never blindly run such a command myself no matter who
handed it to me, and there are people I do trust completely.
However, My choices are spend a lot of effort teaching basic sensibilities
to everyone I wish to help for free, or just provide the command which _I_
know won't hurt them, and anyone who has enough clue and actually desires to
spend the extra 5 seconds, will not need me to tell them how to take my
given command and do the spritual equivalent of their choice.
Many times, trying to help someone not shoot themselves in the foot is so
thankless that it's just a form of me shooting my own self in the foot by
seeming (in their eyes) to have assumed any spec of responsibility for their
problem. Or by telling them of what can happen, the reasons behind various
basic procedures, they misread that as it probably will happen and worry
about it so much they think they should not touch anything or allow anyone
else to do even the basic maintenance they _need_ to do.
So I rarely bother. Whenever anyone asks and seems to actually care about
doing something right instead of of "I want it to magically work,
immediately, without me knowing anything, or paying someone who does, or
spending more than 5 seconds working at it" then I'm happy to provide
whatever excuse for wisdom I have. The more people who do things right, or
as right as they can, or at least _try_, or at least _care_ one way or the
other even if for whatever reason they can't avoid some dirty hack, the
better off we all are, so it's in everyones interest to be helpful. I do get
that.
Brian K. White brian at aljex.com http://www.myspace.com/KEYofR
+++++[>+++[>+++++>+++++++<<-]<-]>>+.>.+++++.+++++++.-.[>+<---]>++.
filePro BBx Linux SCO FreeBSD #callahans Satriani Filk!
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list