screens other than 0-9 (was: Re: Windows 2003/IIS 6 issues...newand improved ones.)
Transpower
transpower at aol.com
Thu May 24 08:18:08 PDT 2007
Mark: Just make a hotkey for the user to press on a numbered screen to
get to an unnumbered screen.
Regards,
Ron Satz
Transpower Corporation
www.transpowercorp.com
Commercial and Custom Software Manufacturing and Certified Systems
Engineering Since 1976
Fairlight wrote on 5/24/2007, 9:51 AM:
> This public service announcement was brought to you by John Esak:
> > Why do you feel it is an oversight? If you can't get to the screens
> with a
> > keystroke from the IUA screen listbox, why show them?
>
> Because they're actually there and meant to be used.
>
> Let's say, for the sake of argument, I had used 0-9 already, and I needed
> more. Let's say I had special-purpose ones that had a lower priority
> than
> 0-9, but still needed to use it (like a "debug" screen).
>
> Why, when entering IUA, should I be any less able to select a screen
> named
> "debug" or "fairlight_only" or whatever it is, than 0-9? They're still
> valid screens. I can create and select them from dscreen, and dscreen
> has
> no problems showing that they exist.
>
> I'm forced to wonder why I should have to create a special menu
> option, or
> at the very least enter a special command just to get at something that
> should be just as easily accessible at 0-9.
>
> I'm really not seeing the linkage between being able to access it via
> keystroke in *clerk and being able to access it from a listbox when
> starting out. You can't access any reports with a keystroke in report,
> processing tables in cabe, etc. But they're selectable when you
> supply no
> input.
>
> It's a matter of primarily ease of access. Secondarily, it's a matter of
> product inconsistency across the breadth of the product. I really don't
> care about the latter, but I do care about the former. I -really- should
> be able to just hit B for IUA in runmenu, select my table, and select my
> screen--no arbitrary limitations. To me, this seems like refusing to
> list
> all tables in ddefine for some arbitrary reason. Speaking of which,
> ddefine has the exact opposite problem. Try just touching "test.txt" in
> your PFDIR once. Run ddefine and see it show up in the listbox of
> "databases"...even though it's clearly not anything of the sort. I just
> tested it and it's never been fixed. (I know people that [strangely]
> like
> to store tarball files in there...that's how I discovered it does that.)
>
> But my primary gripe is lack of quick and easy access to the screen. I
> shouldn't have to jump out of runmenu or make a special menu to do this.
> I don't honestly care that I can't hit one key in clerk and bring up the
> screen. What I care about is ease of launching it regularly from runmenu
> without special consideration, and being able to select it just as I
> would
> any other option not pre-specified. I defined it, I intend to use it, I
> don't see a need for an arbitrary rule telling me I can't get there from
> here unless I take a detour through Timbuktu.
>
> mark->
> --
> No matter what your problems, modern medicine can help!
> http://members.iglou.com/fairlite/fixital/
> _______________________________________________
> Filepro-list mailing list
> Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list