The future of filePro... one major one anyway!

[Bruce Easton]

John Esak wrote Thursday, May 17, 2007 5:54 PM:
>
>
> off". You are only trying to rationalize your unwarrented attack
> on Dennis.

John - maybe it did sound like an attack, but it was a reasonable question.
It didn't sound like an attack to me until once again there was  a lack
of a helpful response.  Dennis has a big recent history of tying up this
forum with half answers (for which he apologized - the last time
readers, even if willingly spent hours that could have been avoided
with some clear directly answers). THAT's what wrong here, not Dennis'
initial reply!

I did look back through your long, but helpful email AFTER Mark's question
because I missed the reference to Weblink and I do not know Weblink.  I
found nothing wrong in what Dennis initially only in the lack of a decent
response thereafter that would be helpful to others.  So for me (and I
would bet future readers) clear, full answers make a big difference.

I am concerned that people at sometimes become wolverines here at the drop
of a hat, but to me it is equally unhelpful to tease people with half
and non-answers to direct question, especially when they are easy to
answer for the benefit of others.

> The very best thing everyone including you
> could do at this point... is leave this thread to posterity and forget it.

Well - I'm not Mark and obviously I'm not everyone if I'm not in the "99%
of those reading."  (Therefore I get to reply and now the 99% have to
stay quiet? - I'm confused on this point.**!@*)


Bruce

Bruce Easton
STN, Inc.