I think this should generate a syntax error... what does everyone else think?

[Kenneth Brody]

Quoting John Esak (Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:41:26 -0500):
[...]
> I had mistenly type in a huge series of lines...
>
>           if: 109 eq "0"
>         then: 009=""
>
> Of course, I meant it to be 109.  No syntax error... I've been running

Leading zeros in numbers aren't significant.   Therefore, the numbers
"009" and "9" are equivalent.

[...]
> Also, while we are at it. I just tried assigning to field 229 when it
> doesn't exist. No error, no warning. I think this would be helpful to...

I get a syntax error.

[...]

--
KenBrody at BestWeb dot net        spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
http://www.hvcomputer.com
http://www.fileProPlus.com