retokenize tables

[Chris Rendall]

I'm the person who setup this Linux system and no one else here would no how to replace dclerk/dreport.  I have a dclerk and a rclerk with different files sizes but they both say 5.0.14R4 when I run them.  I guess I'll redownload filePro from the fptech website and see if that fixes it.
 
Chris 

________________________________

From: Kenneth Brody [mailto:kenbrody at bestweb.net]
Sent: Tue 1/23/2007 8:47 PM
To: Chris Rendall
Cc: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
Subject: RE: retokenize tables



Quoting Chris Rendall (Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:21:50 -0600):
[...]
> > Quoting Chris Rendall (Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:59:19 -0600):
> >
> > > I'm running filePro 5.0.14 on SUSE Enterprise Linux and it acts like
> it
> > > is only using tokenized tables even though I specify dclerk.  Some
> of my
> > > processing tables have not been tokenized for a long time since I've
> > > only been using dclerk/dreport.  Is there a way to automate going
> > > through all my processing tables and create the tok file?
> >
> > dclerk/dreport cannot be using precompiled tok files.  Unless, of
> > course, they're really just renamed copies of rclerk/rreport.
> >
>
> When I type in /appl/fp/dclerk or /appl/fp/dreport the version number in
> the upper right corner says 5.0.14R4.  I'm assuming the "R" in the
> version means rclerk or rreport.  On my UNIX system before it died have
> a version number of 5.0.14D4, if I remember correctly.

Someone replaced your dclerk/dreport with rclerk/rreport.  (That's what
the "R" versus "D" means.)

--
KenBrody at BestWeb dot net        spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
http://www.hvcomputer.com <http://www.hvcomputer.com/> 
http://www.fileProPlus.com <http://www.fileproplus.com/>