Weird report run
Boaz Bezborodko
boaz at mirrotek.com
Wed Sep 13 10:49:32 PDT 2006
Knowing the user I would seriously doubt that either of these were
played with. In any case it wouldn't explain the other weird behavior
of why the output didn't break into separate forms.
Boaz
Joe Chasan wrote:
>if the user has access to modify either the selection set or the sort
>criteria, i'd look at those as possible causes.
>
>-joe
>
>On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 01:31:13PM -0400, Boaz Bezborodko wrote:
>
>
>>Through a selection set. (Looking for a "Y" in a particular field.)
>>
>>GCC Consulting wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From:
>>>>filepro-list-bounces+gccconsulting=comcast.net at lists.celestial
>>>>.com
>>>>[mailto:filepro-list-bounces+gccconsulting=comcast.net at lists.c
>>>>elestial.com] On Behalf Of Boaz Bezborodko
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:11 PM
>>>>To: filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
>>>>Subject: Weird report run
>>>>
>>>>A user ran a report that had a very weird result and I need
>>>>help trying to figure out why. This is a report that has
>>>>been running fine for a long time.
>>>>
>>>>The report picks out invoices to pay and then generates
>>>>checks for them. Each invoice is a line on the report and
>>>>the sort order is by vendor with a new form being generated
>>>>for each new vendor. When it does so it generates a new
>>>>check number and creates a new record for this check in the
>>>>checks file.
>>>>
>>>>The weird thing on this run was that on this run they were
>>>>only generating one check, but a bunch o invoices that should
>>>>not have been selected, from different vendors, were chosen
>>>>and they were printed all on the first form for the original
>>>>check. They should not have been selected, but they were.
>>>>They should not have shown up on the first form as part of
>>>>the one check that was supposed to have run, but they did.
>>>>And they should not have generated their own checks, but they
>>>>did. That last part was the one part that was consistent
>>>>with their being printed even though they shouldn't have
>>>>because they didn't conform to the selection criteria.
>>>>
>>>>I've reviewed the code and can't find any reason why this
>>>>should have happened. Any suggestions as to why the errant
>>>>selection and sort behavior?
>>>>
>>>>Note: I'm using FP 4.8 on Windows.
>>>>
>>>>Boaz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>What is the criteria that you are using to select invoice to pay?
>>>
>>>Is this through -v processing or a selection set?
>>>
>>>Richard Kreiss
>>>GCC Consulting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Filepro-list mailing list
>>Filepro-list at lists.celestial.com
>>http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/filepro-list
>>
>>
>
>--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---
>-Joe Chasan- Magnatech Business Systems, Inc.
>joe at magnatechonline.com Hicksville, NY - USA
>http://www.MagnatechOnline.com Tel.(516) 931-4444/Fax.(516) 931-1264
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/20060913/ca2236c0/attachment.html
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list