OT: cd's again... one last question....
Bob Stockler
bob at trebor.iglou.com
Mon Oct 30 16:21:23 PST 2006
Mark Luljak wrote (on Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:53:21PM -0500):
| Is it just me, or did Mike Schwartz (PC Support) say:
| > > I don't. Not even a little. I bet there is no end of things that can
| > > be used to match up exact tracks from one edge to another, avan across
| > > large gaps from missing pieces, especially with the help of the other
| > > not-missing pieces to draw context hints from. I bet it's even easy
| > > to have it detect mixed shards from different disks and regroup them
| > > appropriately.
| >
| > > Brian
|
| Clearly "out there". Write-once discs are written like old LP's, in a
| single spiral track. The best explanation I've seen of this was at:
|
| http://www.daemon-tools.cc/dtcc/t235-p-some-facts-about-securom-v48x.html
|
| The implications of DPM and the whole configuration of the discs themselves
| suggest that it's a fairly fragile process to read them. If you chop a
| disc into pieces, given the granularity of the media inside you're likely
| entirely dispatching a fair amount of key bits just by making the cut.
| Even if you could glue the whole thing back together and buff it out so
| that it spun halfway reliably without snags, the way the data is laid out
| makes it far less possible than a random-access HD to actually do something
| like raw sector-editor reads from the media. Then there's the refraction
| of any bends or edges in the plastic skewing the data viewing in and of
| itself.
|
| > Reconstructing the pebbles from 100's of destroyed disks would be such
| > a horrendous task that nobody would attempt it, unless the data was
| > invaluable to recover. Then again, look at the painstaking effort that has
| > gone into the dead sea scrolls and other documents.
|
| Well the whole thing gets down to "-reasonable- diligence". We're not
| talking NSA/CIA levels of security, here. I don't have vacuum-sealed and
| monitored pipes for my cabling, either. :)
|
| However, destruction of the disks is preferable IMHO to just scratching the
| surface. Ideally, burning them would be great, but no access to an
| incinerator. That said, anything that actually breaks the thing into a
| -bunch- of pieces would be fine. Nothing out there today -to my knowlege-
| would be able to handle a disk that was that mangled.
|
| The whole thing is that it's for home use, pretty much. I don't feel like
| spending $250+ on a "shredder" that either doesn't do a sufficient job or
| burns out after 25 uses. Having broken the things by hand before, I know
| how resilient they are, and I just can't see any of the solutions I've
| looked at so far lasting very long until you get up into the $500+
| industrial range. Is destroying your Quicken backups from 6-18 months ago
| really worth $500+? Likely not. But none of the cheaper solutions look
| like they're worth a damn. I'm particularly wary of ones that just scratch
| the surfaces.
|
| I'm starting to wonder if just holding the thing over a Zippo at
| scattered/random intervals would work. The whole dye sublimation
| thing on CD-R's is heat-based. Not so sure about how the DVD's are
| made though--never researched it. I know this likely would NOT work
| for RW media, as that actually rotates the crystals into a different
| phase...totally different technology, at least for CDRW. But RW media
| isn't an issue because you could just use a zeroing deletion tool. It's
| the write-once that puzzles me.
|
| You know, much to my annoyance I had a Dokken disc fall out of the glove
| box in my car once, onto the floor...and then a case fell cornerwise on top
| of it. The data layer (on this conventional CD) actually squeezed so thin
| that you could see through that area as transparent. That'd be one way to
| go about it, but you find which exact areas of the disk to mutilate...how?
Well, you could send the CD-ROMs to Samsung and have them give
them the same treatment they gave to the Install CD-ROM that came
with the LCD monitor of their's I recently purchased - completely
unreadable.
Or get the promised Plextor device that promises to do the same
thing (I wonder if Samsung was testing that for them?).
Bob
--
Bob Stockler +-+ bob at trebor.iglou.com +-+ http://members.iglou.com/trebor
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list