browse lookup phenomenon

[Dennis Malen]

Ken,

Do you mean a -z for an alternate input processing table or a -y for an 
alternate auto processing table?

If you do mean -y what are you trying to rule out? Am I putting the 
processing in the new auto table or am I running the processing from input 
processing and using the -y to create a blank auto processing table?

Please clarify.

Thanks,

Dennis
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth Brody" <kenbrody at bestweb.net>
To: "Dennis Malen" <dmalen at malen.com>
Cc: <filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: browse lookup phenomenon


> Quoting Dennis Malen (Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:49:10 -0500):
>
>> I listed this problem yesterday. Is anyone out there familiar with this
>> problem.
>>
>> The browse lookup reacts differently if executed from "input" as opposed
>> to "chain". I have no idea how to fix it.
>
> Well, given that the prc that you chain to becomes the input prc, I
> don't see how it would make any difference.  If you run that same prc
> with "-y", does it work?
>
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dennis Malen" <dmalen at malen.com>
>> To: <filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 6:45 PM
>> Subject: browse lookup phenomenon
>>
>>
>> >I am on filePro 4.8.14D4 with IBM AIX UNIX.
> [...]
>> > IDENTIFIED PROBLEM: The processing the users complained of was
>> processing
>> > that they had been using for years. But------ that day I had just
>> moved
>> > the processing from "input" processing to a "chained" process. It
>> works
>> > perfectly in input but not in the chained processing.
>> >
>> > Then I find out that this has been happening on other browse lookups.
>> > Further investigation revealed that those were all chained also.
> [...]
>
> Do you have files that you could send to fpsupport?
>
> --
> KenBrody at BestWeb dot net        spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
> http://www.hvcomputer.com
> http://www.fileProPlus.com
>
>
>