Antique filePro (was Re: feature list for positive suggestions)
Kenneth Brody
kenbrody at bestweb.net
Sat Jan 21 06:47:35 PST 2006
Quoting Brian K. White (Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:25:42 -0500):
[...]
> Heck I think 4.1 still has a place in the universe even today because
> it is the highest version possible in certain environments. I don't
> remember (maybe never knew clearly) exactly what aspect of the dos
> environment or memory model it was that advanced at some point and
> made it possible to make binaries that didn't run on the older dos
> version or on the older hardware. himem vs emm386 vs no mem manager?
> 8 vs 16 vs 32 bit? real mode vs protected mode?
We introduced a 32-bit protected mode version way back when, which
required a 386 or better. At some point in the future, we dropped
the 16-bit DOS version. So, unless you're on a 286 or earlier, that
part is not an issue. Then, at some point we added a native Windows
version in addition to the 32-bit protected mode DOS version. Later
still we dropped the DOS version. I believe it was either 4.8 or 5.0
when we finally dropped DOS. So, if you're still in a pre-Windows 95
environment, then you would be "stuck" at 4.5, I believe.
> Whatever it was, 4.1 came in 2 flavors, one that still worked an older
> way and one that worked a newer way. And that 4.1 special version was
> the last version like that ever. So it's the highest version that can
> possibly run in certain environments.
I thought it was 4.5, but perhaps you are correct about 4.1 being the
last DOS version. Of course, in such an environment, what other software
can you run as well?
> One such environment is a completely current and modern PocketPC with a
> DOS emulator, which is the only way to run filepro on such a device if
> you needed to so badly that it was worth the hassle.
Okay.
[...]
--
KenBrody at BestWeb dot net spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
http://www.hvcomputer.com
http://www.fileProPlus.com
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list