The year 2000 (was Re: Happy Birthday...)

[CDAY]

Kenneth Brody wrote:
> Quoting CDAY (Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:11:47 -0500):
> [...]
> 
>>Do I remember you used this same analogy in 2000 for the celebration
>>being a year early?
> 
> [...]
> 
> And let's not forget that filePro 1.0 correctly knew that the year 2000
> was a leap year.  Unlike some programs from a multi-zillion-dollar
> corporation with thousands of programmers *cough*Access*cough*, which
> needed to be corrected as they claimed 2000 was not a leap year?
> 
> :-)
> 

Kind of proves that Glitz is what sells although GM and Ford are 
proving that does not hold true forever.

Charles Day