OT: "network neutrality" and the internet
Kenneth Brody
kenbrody at bestweb.net
Thu Apr 27 06:30:15 PDT 2006
Quoting Jay R. Ashworth (Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:34:10 -0400):
[...]
> > But doesn't "common carrier" status mean you have to follow some
> > additional, "special" rules?
>
> It would, but Internet backbone carrier are not, in general, Common
> Carriers as that term of art is used in the telecom business.
I thought that they had common carrier status, which protects them
from suits over things like carrying "illegal" things like kiddie
porn and harassment?
> > How would your regular phone service deal with different priorities
> > if AT&T could give their traffic higher priority than MCI's calls?
>
> Funny you should mention that:
>
>
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/telecom/2003-08-04-mci-probes-self_x.htm
:-)
--
KenBrody at BestWeb dot net spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
http://www.hvcomputer.com
http://www.fileProPlus.com
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list